P. v. Jones CA3
Following guilty pleas in seven different cases of theft and drug offenses, defendant Gregory Brian Jones appeals. In his initial brief defendant contended: (1) the trial court improperly stayed rather than struck on-bail enhancements (§ 12022.1) in two cases; (2) the trial court imposed concurrent sentences in two of his cases for possession and transportation of the same drugs, contrary to section 654; (3) the trial court erred in denying his motion to strike a prior conviction under the Three Strikes law “in furtherance of justice” (Pen. Code, § 1385; People v. Superior Court (Romero) (1996) 13 Cal.4th 497 (Romero)); and (4) two restitution fines were improperly imposed ex post facto.
Comments on P. v. Jones CA3