legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Price CA3
Defendant William Glenn Price contends the trial court violated Penal Code section 2900.5 and the equal protection clause when it denied his request for presentence custody credit by denying his motion to modify. He argues he should have received credit for time he spent out of custody but subject to the supervised own recognizance (SOR) program and global positioning system (GPS) agreement.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale