legal news


Register | Forgot Password

BLACK HILLS INVESTMENTS, INC., v. ALBERTSON'S, INC.,
Contracts to sell unsubdivided parcels of real property were void for violating Subdivision Map Act where they were entered into before seller recorded a parcel map, and they expressly permitted seller to waive the condition that a parcel map be recorded prior to the closing date. Where contracts provided that buyer's earnest money deposit for two parcels of land was nonrefundable, seller a year after entering into contracts recorded parcel map subdividing property into four smaller parcels including the two that buyer agreed to purchase, and buyer subsequently gave notice of termination before closing date on basis that late recordation prevented it from performing due diligence, court properly granted buyer's summary judgment motion on claim that it was entitled to return of earnest money because contracts were void. Buyer's act of objecting to certain proposed changes in contracts following seller's recordation of parcel map did not constitute ratification of the contracts.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale