legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re C.B. CA1/5
J.B. (Father) appeals the denial of his Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petition in which he sought to change the juvenile court’s order bypassing reunification services between Father and C.B. (Minor). Father also appeals the juvenile court’s decision, at the section 366.26 hearing (.26 hearing), to terminate parental rights and make adoption the permanent plan for Minor. Father contends the juvenile court should have applied either the beneficial relationship exception or the sibling relationship exception to adoption. (§ 366.26, subds. (c)(1)(B)(i), (c)(1)(B)(v).) We disagree and affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale