legal news


Register | Forgot Password

A.J. v. Superior Court CA1/3
J.D. (mother) and A.J. (father) have each filed a writ petition challenging a juvenile court order terminating their reunification services and setting a section 366.26 hearing to determine whether their parental rights should be terminated. (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 366.26.) Mother claims that she did not receive reasonable reunification services and that services should have been extended. Father contends that the record does not support the juvenile court’s findings that he failed to make progress toward achieving the goals of his case plan and there was no probability that the parties’ son J.J. could be returned home if services were extended. Having thoroughly reviewed the record, we conclude the juvenile court’s findings are supported by law and the record. Accordingly, we deny the petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale