In re D.K. CA2/6
D.K., now 18 years old, appeals from a disposition order providing that he remain a ward of the juvenile court (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 602) and that he be placed on probation in the home of his guardian. The order followed appellant’s admission that he had committed first degree residential burglary. (Pen. Code, §§ 459, 460, subd. (a).) Appellant argues: (1) substantial evidence establishes his mental incompetency, (2) he was erroneously presumed to be competent, and (3) the juvenile court erroneously refused to conduct a second competency hearing after he had been found competent at an earlier hearing. We affirm.
Comments on In re D.K. CA2/6