P. v. Ayala CA3
Defendant Enrique Cuevas Ayala appeals his convictions for possession of methamphetamine for sale and transportation of methamphetamine. He contends the reconstructed record is inadequate for a meaningful review of the search warrant officers obtained to search his home and car, along with his accomplice’s home. In the event we conclude the record is adequate, he requests we review the search warrant to determine whether it is supported by probable cause. Defendant further challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his convictions, the giving of the aiding and abetting instruction, and the admission of several portions of his police interview. Lastly, defendant contends cumulative error resulted from these individual errors.
Comments on P. v. Ayala CA3