P. v. Williams CA4/1
Defendant James Earl Williams appeals from a judgment revoking his probation. The court based its ruling on evidence adduced at a preliminary hearing on an unrelated case, indicating that Williams received stolen property and possessed methamphetamine. He argues that his Fourteenth Amendment right to due process was violated because substantial evidence did not support the court's factual findings and because the court applied an unconstitutionally low standard of proof. Defendant also contends that his Sixth Amendment rights were violated when defense counsel failed to object to the admission of certain evidence.
Comments on P. v. Williams CA4/1