P. v. Humphreys CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Devin Leeizacc Humphreys (defendant) appeals from his felony assault and sex offense convictions. He contends that the trial court erred by admitting evidence of uncharged misconduct pursuant to Evidence Code sections 1101 and 1108; failing to exclude rebuttal evidence as a discovery violation sanction; instructional error, including giving an instruction regarding consciousness of guilt; limiting impeachment evidence; and improperly consolidating two separately filed cases. Defendant also contends that the cumulative effect of the errors deprived him of his rights to due process and a fair trial. We find all of defendant’s contentions to be without merit, and affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Humphreys CA2/2