In re A.V. CA5
Appellant A.V. (father) appeals the juvenile court’s order terminating his reunification services as to his son, A.V., Jr. (A.V.), at a hearing held pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.21, subdivision (f). He contends the court’s order finding the Stanislaus County Community Services Agency (agency) offered reasonable reunification services to him must be reversed and he should be granted further reunification services because (1) the juvenile court’s finding that the agency made reasonable efforts to provide reasonable services was supported by insufficient evidence and (2) the court improperly used father’s level of engagement in its determination the agency offered reasonable services. We disagree and affirm.
Comments on In re A.V. CA5