legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re L.D. CA5
Appellant Suzanne G.’s (mother’s) children, L.D. and S.G., were removed from her custody and placed with maternal relatives in Texas after reunification services were terminated. Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 petitions were filed by mother and heard at the same time as the section 366.26 hearing to terminate parental rights and set a permanent plan of adoption. The juvenile court denied the section 388 petitions, terminated mother’s parental rights, and set a permanent plan of adoption for both girls.
Mother appeals, contending the juvenile court abused its discretion when it denied her section 388 petitions and erred in failing to find the beneficial parent-child exception set forth in section 366.26, subdivision (c)(1)(B)(i) applied. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale