legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Veaver CA3
Pursuant to People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, appointed counsel for defendant William Franklin Veaver has asked us to review the record for arguable issues in defendant’s appeals from the denial of his motion to vacate judgment pursuant to Penal Code section 1473.7, which allows a noncustodial defendant to move to vacate a judgment of conviction due to prejudicial error damaging the moving party’s ability to meaningfully understand adverse immigration consequences and if newly discovered evidence of actual innocence exists (appeal No. C086270), and from the denial of his motion for release of client files from his defense counsel in the underlying criminal action (appeal No. C084121). Because we find that defendant is not entitled to Wende review, we dismiss the appeal as abandoned.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale