legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re B.K. CA3
This dependency case commenced in November 2016 when the minor was detained due, primarily, to mother’s substance abuse. The juvenile court declared the minor a dependent child, and both mother and father received reunification services for six and nine months, respectively. During the reunification period, the paternal grandmother requested placement of the minor. Her request was denied because her placement packet was still being processed.
Reunification services were terminated one year later. At the time services were terminated, the juvenile court readdressed the issue of placement of the minor with the paternal grandmother, whose home had been approved for placement. The juvenile court ordered the paternal grandmother to submit to a hair follicle test and directed her not to alter her hair prior to the testing. The paternal grandmother did not comply with the testing order. On November 28, 2017, the juvenile court granted the Shasta County Health and Human Services A

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale