Marriage of McKinley CA4/2
On December 21, 2015, the family court ordered the dissolution of the marriage of Catherine McKinley (Wife) and Russell McKinley (Husband). In June 2015, temporary spousal support and child support were set at zero dollars. On December 21, Wife and Husband entered into a marriage settlement agreement (the Agreement), which reflected the temporary June 2015 support orders “shall continue in full force and effect.” The family court ordered spousal and child support per the Agreement, i.e., zero dollars. In May 2016, Husband requested a modification of the spousal support order. Husband requested $1,000 per month in spousal support. The family court denied Husband’s request.
Husband raises three issues on appeal. First, Husband contends the family court erred by concluding Family Code section 4326 did not apply. Second, Husband asserts the family court erred by finding that, at the time of executing the Agreement, it was reasonably within the expectations of Husband an
Comments on Marriage of McKinley CA4/2