P. v. Karimi CA4/1
Karimi's sole contention on appeal is that the judgment should be reversed because the trial court failed to adequately investigate whether prejudicial juror bias arose due to an interaction that the jury had with a defense trial witness (Karimi's mother) while waiting in the courtroom hallway during a break in the proceedings. We conclude that Karimi's contention lacks merit, and accordingly we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Karimi CA4/1