legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re K.F. CA4/3
K.F. (child), the child of defendants and respondents E.H. (mother) and A.F. (father), appeals from the grant of mother’s petition under Welfare and Institutions Code section 388 (all further statutory references are to this code unless otherwise stated) to provide reunification services to her after they had initially been denied. Child argues the court abused its discretion in granting the petition because mother did not prove the required changed circumstances or that it is in child’s best interest for services to be provided to her.
Mother and father contend there was no abuse of discretion because mother proved changed circumstances and services to her were in child’s best interest. Mother also maintains neither child nor the de facto parent have standing to appeal. Plaintiff and respondent Orange County Social Services Agency (SSA) filed a letter brief supporting mother and father.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale