P. v. Cook CA1/3
Eric Cook was convicted by a jury of second degree burglary, receiving stolen property, and possessing burglary tools. Cook contends the trial court erroneously modified the standard jury instruction on aiding and abetting burglary, and that the error was prejudicial. He also asserts the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument and that a condition of his mandatory supervision that prohibits him from possessing burglary tools and spark plugs is unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. We modify the supervision condition to add a scienter requirement, and otherwise affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Cook CA1/3