Higgins v. Franco CA2/4
Plaintiff and appellant Jamie Higgins, a convicted murderer serving a life sentence without the possibility of parole, initiated a civil action for legal malpractice against defendant and respondent Yolanda Franco, the attorney appointed to represent him in postconviction discovery proceedings ancillary to a petition for writ of habeas corpus (Pen. Code, § 1054.9). The superior court granted respondent’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Higgins appeals, but failed to provide an adequate record for our review. Accordingly, we affirm.
Comments on Higgins v. Franco CA2/4