legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Wallace CA3
Defendant Byron Charles Wallace appeals a judgment entered after a jury verdict finding him guilty of two counts of oral copulation with a person under the age of 18 (counts one, two); two counts of penetration with a foreign object (counts three, four); annoying a minor (count five); unlawful contact or communication with a minor (count six); dissuading a witness (count seven); and three counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor (counts eight, nine, ten). He argues insufficient evidence supports his convictions for unlawful sexual intercourse with M. Doe (the victim), and annoying a minor. He also complains certain testimony that was stricken was so prejudicial that it violated his rights to “due process and a fair trial under the Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendments and their California counterparts,” requiring reversal. Finally, defendant requests this court independently review subpoenaed school records to determine whether the trial court erred in not releasing

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale