legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Schafer v. City of Los Angeles CA2/3
Plaintiffs Carl Schafer and Elizabeth Leslie appeal from an order denying their motion for attorney fees under Code of Civil Procedure section 1021.5. Plaintiffs successfully petitioned the trial court for a writ of mandate directing the City of Los Angeles (City) to revoke permits for a commercial parking lot located near two homes Plaintiffs own in the neighborhood. In denying private attorney general fees, the trial court determined Plaintiffs’ private economic interest, as represented by the claimed diminution in the value of their property, was more than sufficient to justify their suit against the City, regardless of any public interest that the legal action also advanced. The court applied the correct legal standard and the evidence supports its conclusion. We find no abuse of discretion. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale