P. v. Burns CA4/3
Appellant challenges his conviction for indecent exposure on the basis there is insufficient evidence he willfully intended to direct public attention to his genitals. He also contends the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the lesser offense of lewd conduct, and the prosecutor committed prejudicial misconduct in closing argument. Finding no grounds to reverse, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Burns CA4/3