In re O.B. CA1/5
O.B. appeals after the juvenile court sustained the allegations of a wardship petition (Welf. & Inst., § 602) alleging that he committed the offenses of carjacking, second degree robbery, receiving stolen property and taking/driving a vehicle without permission. (Pen. Code, §§ 215, subd. (a), 211, 496d, subd. (a); Veh. Code, § 10851, subd. (a).) He contends: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support the true findings; (2) he was deprived of due process because the same judge presided over the detention and jurisdictional hearing and reviewed material in the detention report before making a jurisdictional finding; and (3) the finding on the receiving stolen property count must be set aside because it is based on the same stolen property as the carjacking and robbery. We reverse the adjudication for receiving stolen property but otherwise affirm.
Comments on In re O.B. CA1/5