P. v. Cagle CA1/4
Appellant Edward Cagle appeals from an order extending his period of commitment to a state mental hospital as a mentally disordered offender (MDO) pursuant to Penal Code section 2972, subdivision (c). Appellant contends his recommitment hearing was fundamentally unfair due to the improper admission of substantial amounts of case-specific hearsay through an expert witness, in violation of People v. Sanchez (2016) 63 Cal.4th 665 (Sanchez). For the reasons set forth below, we dismiss the appeal as moot.
Comments on P. v. Cagle CA1/4