legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re I.C. CA6
In this appeal, D.G. (Mother) asks us to reverse a juvenile court order issued by the court pursuant to section 361.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code denying her reunification services with respect to her daughter, I.C.. At the March 2018 dispositional hearing in this matter, the trial court bypassed Mother for reunification services in accordance with subdivision of section 361.5. Under those provisions, the court is not required to offer reunification services to a parent if the court has previously terminated reunification services or parental rights with respect to a sibling or half sibling of the child and the parent “has not subsequently made a reasonable effort to treat the problems that led to removal of the sibling or half sibling . . . .” Mother argues that the juvenile court erred in finding that she had not made reasonable efforts to treat her long-standing substance abuse issues.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale