Kelly v. Kelley CA1/2
This is the third appeal generated by this dispute. Here is what we said at the beginning of our last opinion:
“This is the second appeal arising from an alleged employment relationship between appellant Patrick Kelly and Thomas White, now deceased. Appellant’s first case against White resulted in a judgment in favor of White’s estate, which this court recently affirmed. The present case arises from the same underlying facts and asserts some of the same and some different causes of action. The trial court sustained demurrers to all causes of action without leave to amend and entered judgment for respondents. Appellant contends the court abused its discretion. We affirm the judgment as to six of the eight causes of action alleged in the complaint. As to two causes of action [i.e., for breach of a 2005 contract and quantum meruit], however, we agree with appellant that the trial court erred.
Comments on Kelly v. Kelley CA1/2