P. v. Ravaglia CA1/3
Defendant Adam Ravaglia appeals his conviction for two counts of insurance fraud, one in violation of Penal Code section 550, subdivision (a)(1), and the other in violation of section 550, subdivision (b)(2). Ravaglia raises four issues: (1) the trial court erred in discharging a juror for good cause during deliberations; (2) the trial court abused its discretion in denying substitute defense counsel’s request for a continuance; (3) the trial court prejudicially erred in admitting evidence under the business record exception to the hearsay rule; and (4) the cumulative impact of these errors requires reversal. The judgment is affirmed.
Comments on P. v. Ravaglia CA1/3