P. v. Escobedo CA2/1
Jurors convicted defendant Amanda Escobedo of robbery, rejecting her mistaken identity defense. At trial, defendant argued that jurors should discredit two eyewitness identifications of defendant. The jury verdict indicated that jurors found one or both eyewitnesses credible. On appeal, defendant argues the eyewitnesses lacked credibility. We reject defendant’s attempt to relitigate credibility on appeal. “Issues of witness credibility are for the jury.” (People v. Boyer (2006) 38 Cal.4th 412, 480.) We affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Escobedo CA2/1