In re M.P. CA5
Appellant M.P. appeals from a dispositional order issued pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code sections 602 and 725 after the juvenile court found he had evaded a police officer, driven under the influence of alcohol, and was an unlicensed driver, all misdemeanors. M.P. was placed on probation, a condition of which required that he submit to searches of his electronic devices to ensure he did not associate with certain specified coparticipants in a previous matter. On appeal, he challenges the true finding of evading a police officer and the electronics search condition of his probation. The People move to dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction based on technical deficiencies in the notice of appeal.
We conclude we have jurisdiction over the appeal and deny the People’s motion. We find the evidence insufficient to support the true finding on evading a police officer and therefore strike this finding.
Comments on In re M.P. CA5