legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Alvarez CA6
Defendant Anthony Michael Alvarez appealed from an order denying his request to strike a prior prison term enhancement imposed under Penal Code section 667.5, subdivision (b). Defendant contended that the trial court was required to strike the enhancement, because the offense underlying the conviction had been redesignated a misdemeanor pursuant to section 1170.18 after the passage of Proposition 47. We affirmed the order. The California Supreme Court granted review, deferred briefing, and then transferred the case back to this court to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of People v. Buycks (2018) 5 Cal.5th 857 (Buycks). We vacate our original opinion and reverse the order.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale