In re G.V. CA6
Following a contested jurisdictional hearing, the juvenile court found true the allegations in a Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 petition alleging that the minor, G.V., committed two counts of felony assault by means of force likely to produce great bodily injury (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(4)). At the dispositional hearing, the juvenile court declared G.V. a ward of the court and returned her to the custody of her guardian on probation, with conditions including that she report any “police contacts” to her probation officer and that she not move out of Monterey County or leave the State of California without the permission of the court or her probation officer.
On appeal, G.V. contends the juvenile court erred in its ruling at the jurisdictional hearing because it misunderstood the legal elements of section 245, subdivision (a)(4). G.V. also argues that the juvenile court erred at the dispositional hearing by imposing the two probation conditions described above.
Comments on In re G.V. CA6