legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re James V.
Appellant, the father of the minor, appeals from an order of the juvenile court terminating his parental rights. (Welf. & Inst. Code, SS 366.26, 395; further undesignated statutory references are to the Welfare and Institutions Code.) Appellant contends the juvenile court abused its discretion in denying his petition for modification (S 388). Appellant also claims the court and Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) violated notice requirements of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978 (ICWA). (25 U.S.C. S 1901 et seq.) DHHS concedes ICWA notice requirements were not met. Court reverse conditionally and remand for proper notice only.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale