In re K.T.
Appellant appeals from an order continuing wardship pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602 upon a finding that he committed a first degree residential burglary. (Pen. Code, S 459.) Appellant was placed in the care, custody and control of the probation officer for suitable placement and contends discovery of his fingerprints four days after the burglary on the window used to enter the house did not provide the required substantial evidence of guilt. Appellant additionally claims probation conditions which fail to give him reasonable notice as to what conduct is forbidden are unconstitutionally vague and overbroad. For reasons stated in the opinion, court affirm the order of wardship.
Comments on In re K.T.