P. v. Brooks CA1/4
David Anthony Brooks appeals from a post judgment order amending his abstract of judgment to indicate which statute provided authority for his presentence custody credits. Appellate counsel for Brooks filed an opening brief identifying no potentially arguable issues and asking this court to independently review the record under People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436. In addition, Brooks has had an opportunity to file a supplemental brief with this court but has not done so. We have reviewed the entire record and conclude no issue warrants further briefing, but we remand to the trial court to correct the abstract of judgment to reflect the correct number of presentence conduct credits.
Comments on P. v. Brooks CA1/4