In re N.M. CA2/2
In this juvenile dependency case, defendant and appellant R.M. (father) challenges the juvenile court’s jurisdictional findings and orders declaring his three children dependents of the court. In particular, father argues neither his alcohol use nor his domestic disputes with his wife and mother of the children (mother) placed the children at a substantial risk of serious physical harm. As explained below, we conclude substantial evidence supports one ground for the juvenile court’s exercise of dependency jurisdiction and, therefore, we affirm.
Comments on In re N.M. CA2/2