Rojas v. Bank of America CA4/2
Plaintiff, Jorge Rojas, defaulted on a real estate loan from defendants Bank of America, NA (BA), Bank of New York Mellon, NA (BNYM), resulting in foreclosure and a trustee’s sale of the property, which was purchased by defendant Duke Partners II, LLC (Duke). Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (SAC) against defendants for violation of “AB 278/SB 900,” unfair business practice (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 17200, et seq.), and quiet title/injunctive relief, was dismissed without leave to amend following the trial court’s ruling sustaining BA and BNYM’s (collectively the Banks) demurrer, and Duke’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. The trial court found that the SAC included new causes of action without leave of court, and that Duke was a bona fide purchaser. Plaintiff appealed.
On appeal, plaintiff challenges the trial court’s orders sustaining the demurrers without leave to amend and the motion for judgment on the pleadings. We affirm.
Comments on Rojas v. Bank of America CA4/2