Marriage of Peters CA5
In this marriage dissolution proceeding, appellant Kurt Allan Peters (Husband) contends the trial court erred in characterizing certain assets as community property rather than as his separate property and erred in various orders of reimbursement.
We conclude the trial court did not err in (1) characterizing Husband’s ownership interest in Peters Property Management, a partnership, as community property; (2) characterizing certain retirement accounts as community property; (3) concluding the community held a one-half ownership interest in a condominium with Husband’s parents; and (4) finding Husband breached a fiduciary duty when he transferred all of the rents collected from the condominium’s tenants to his parents.
Comments on Marriage of Peters CA5