P. v. Mercado CA2/2
Defendant and appellant Jose Luis Mercado (defendant) appeals his carjacking conviction. Defendant contends that the conviction was not supported by substantial evidence showing a joint operation of act and intent. Defendant also contends that the trial court erred by incorrectly modifying an unnecessary instruction regarding after-acquired intent, and that the instruction was misleading when combined with incorrect legal argument by the prosecutor. As we find no merit to defendant’s claims, we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Mercado CA2/2