Cardiodiagnostic Imaging Inc. v. Bledin CA2/1
Cardiodiagnostic Imaging Inc. (Cardio) sued Anthony G. Bledin, M.D. (Bledin), and others for causes of action arising from an alleged contract among the parties. In May 2015, the court sustained a demurrer against Cardio on its cause of action for specific performance. Cardio’s remaining claims for breach of contract and conversion were tried to the court.
After Cardio presented its case in chief, the court granted the defendants’ motions for judgment. Cardio, the court found, failed to prove the existence of an enforceable contract, that if a contract did exist, Cardio was not a party to it, and Cardio failed to establish any of the elements of conversion. After the entry of judgment in April 2017, Cardio appealed. For the reasons discussed below, we reject Cardio’s arguments and affirm the judgment.
Comments on Cardiodiagnostic Imaging Inc. v. Bledin CA2/1