legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re O.R. CA4/2
Defendant and appellant, L.C. (Mother), is the mother of O.R., a child born in April 2013. Objectors and appellants, K.R. and T.R. (born in 2010), are Mother’s older children and O.R.’s half siblings. Mother, K.R., and T.R. appeal from the August 16, 2018, order terminating parental rights to O.R.
Mother claims the Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26 order must be reversed because the juvenile court and plaintiff and respondent, San Bernardino County Children and Family Services (CFS), failed to give adequate notice of the proceedings pursuant to the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) (25 U.S.C. § 1901 et seq.) and related California law (Welf. & Inst. Code, §§ 224.2, 224.3). T.R. and K.R. join this claim, and CFS and we agree it has merit. The ICWA notices did not include known identifying information concerning O.R.’s maternal great-grandmother (the MGGM), including her names, approximate dates of birth and death, and a partial address.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale