legal news


Register | Forgot Password

S.T. v. Superior Court CA4/2
Petitioners S.T. (Mother) and G.R. (Father) are the parents of A.R., who was four months old at the time of removal and 14 months old on the date of the challenged orders. By separate petition, each parent seeks extraordinary relief from the court’s orders of August 30, 2018, sustaining the petition filed under Section 300 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, denying reunification services, and setting a hearing under section 366.26 to consider terminating parental rights and setting a permanent plan for A.R. The parents argue the jurisdictional findings are not supported by substantial evidence and the court abused its discretion when it denied reunification services. For the reasons described post, we deny both petitions.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale