P. v. Matko CA1/5
Appellant Danielle Matko, a teacher, was convicted after a jury trial of five counts arising from her sexual contact with two 15-year-old male students. She contends: (1) the court abused its discretion under Evidence Code section 352 by excluding evidence that her primary victim had once made a threat to commit a school shooting that was determined to be not credible; and (2) the conviction on one of the counts must be reversed because it was obtained after a readback of testimony that did not include the cross-examination of the relevant witness and was conducted outside appellant’s presence. We affirm.
Comments on P. v. Matko CA1/5