legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re N.T. CA1/3
N.T. (defendant), born in March 2000, appeals from the juvenile court’s dispositional order finding he committed misdemeanor disorderly conduct (Pen. Code, § 647, subd. (j)(1)) and placing him on probation with various conditions. Defendant challenges the following probation conditions on appeal: (1) a condition prohibiting him from possessing a smart phone; (2) conditions requiring his assessment for—and if appropriate, participation in—sex offender counseling; and (3) a condition prohibiting him from entering into “a position of trust or authority” with a minor “unless under the authority and auspices of his school.” We conclude the third challenged condition is vague and therefore remand the matter for the court to modify or strike the condition in light of the principles set forth in this opinion. We affirm the order in all other respects.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale