legal news


Register | Forgot Password

P. v. Garcia
Defendant appeals a judgment after jury trial, following his conviction of making criminal threats (Pen. Code, S 422), corporal injury to a child's parent (S 273.5, subd. (a)), forcible oral copulation (S 288a, subd. (c)(2)), sexual battery by restraint (S 243.4, subd. (a)), and forcible rape (S 261, subd. (a)(2)). The court imposed an aggregate state prison term of 24 years and 8 months, which included an upper term sentence of 8 years for the forcible oral copulation count, and the upper term of 8 years for the forcible rape count. The court ruled that those sentences run consecutively.
Court conclude 1) the trial court did not err by imposing consecutive sentences for Defendant's convictions of forcible oral copulation and forcible rape, and 2) the trial judge's exercise of discretion to impose the upper terms for those offenses does not implicate Defendant's Sixth Amendment right to a jury trial. (People v. Black (2005) 35 Cal.4th 1238, 1244.) Court affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2024 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2024 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale