Selter v. Gledhill CA4/1
Beverly Wilson Gledhill (Beverly) appeals from an order and judgment dismissing her complaint against Fred Gledhill (Fred) under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil Procedure section 425.16. Appellant contends the trial court erred in granting Fred's anti-SLAPP motion because (1) Beverly's claims do not arise from protected activity and (2) even if they did, appellant demonstrated a probability of success on the merits. We affirm because Beverly's causes of action arise out of protected activity—the settlement of a prior lawsuit between the parties—and her claims are barred by the litigation privilege.
Comments on Selter v. Gledhill CA4/1