legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re M.C. CA5
A Welfare and Institutions Code section 300 petition was filed on behalf of M.C. and A.C. At a section 366.26 hearing, the parental rights of mother (A.M.) and father (J.C.) were terminated. Father contends the juvenile court erred in terminating his parental rights because the evidence established the beneficial parent-child relationship exception as to him.
Mother’s appeal raises no issues as to her termination of parental rights. However, she asserts that if the termination of father’s parental rights is reversed, her parental rights must also be reinstated.
We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale