legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Solaymanpour v. CA Glatt Center Inc. CA2/5
Plaintiff and appellant Parvaneh Solaymanpour (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment and postjudgment orders in favor of defendant and respondent CA Glatt Center, Inc., dba Pico Glatt Kosher Market (defendant). Plaintiff sued defendant for negligence and premises liability, seeking damages for burns suffered at defendant’s hot food counter. After the case ended in a jury verdict in favor of defendant, the court served notice of entry of judgment on both parties. Plaintiff filed a motion for new trial, which the court denied after a hearing. One week later, plaintiff filed a motion for relief under Code of Civil Procedure section 473, subdivision (b), seeking to set aside the court’s earlier order denying her motion for new trial. The court denied the motion for relief, citing section 660 and its jurisdictional requirement that a court rule on a motion for a new trial within 60 days after notice of entry of judgment is served by mail.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale