legal news


Register | Forgot Password

Stevens v. Lennar Homes of Cal., Inc. CA4/2
Plaintiffs Jasper and Brenda Stevens are in pro. per. They assert claims — primarily for nondisclosure — arising out of their purchase of a house in 2006. Defendant Lennar Homes of California, Inc. (Lennar) built and sold the house. Defendant Harveston Homeowners Association (Harveston) is the homeowners’ association for the development that the house is in.
Lennar and Harveston demurred to the operative complaint. The Stevenses never filed oppositions. They were granted one continuance of the hearing, so they could obtain counsel. They then sought a second continuance, again so they could obtain counsel, and also so they could add a new party. The trial court denied a second continuance and sustained the demurrers.
The Stevenses appeal, contending that the trial court erred by denying them a second continuance. We will hold that the trial court could reasonably find that there was no good cause.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale