In re S.J. CA2/7
Following the juvenile court’s termination of reunification services and setting of a selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, Tamara J., the mother of 10-year-old S.J., petitioned to reinstate reunification services under section 388, arguing her participation in individual therapy had resulted in improved emotional stability. The court denied the petition. On appeal Tamara contends the court erred in finding she had failed to carry her burden to show changed circumstances and that reinstatement of services was in S.J.’s best interests. We affirm.
Comments on In re S.J. CA2/7