legal news


Register | Forgot Password

In re S.J. CA2/7
Following the juvenile court’s termination of reunification services and setting of a selection and implementation hearing pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 366.26, Tamara J., the mother of 10-year-old S.J., petitioned to reinstate reunification services under section 388, arguing her participation in individual therapy had resulted in improved emotional stability. The court denied the petition. On appeal Tamara contends the court erred in finding she had failed to carry her burden to show changed circumstances and that reinstatement of services was in S.J.’s best interests. We affirm.

Search thread for
Download thread as



Quick Reply

Your Name:
Your Comment:

smiling face wink grin cool nod sticking out tongue raised eyebrow confused shocked shaking head disapproval rolling eyes sad mad

Click an emoji to insert it into your message. You may use BB Codes in your message.
Spam Prevention:

    Home | About Us | Privacy | Subscribe
    © 2025 Fearnotlaw.com The california lawyer directory

  Copyright © 2025 Result Oriented Marketing, Inc.

attorney
scale