P. v. Hernandez CA4/3
Oscar Rodolfo Hernandez appeals from a judgment after a jury convicted him of sexual offenses involving his stepdaughters. Hernandez argues the following: the trial court erred by denying his motion to dismiss for precharging delay; the court made various evidentiary errors; the court erred by limiting his right to cross-examine witnesses; and there was cumulative error. None of his contentions have merit, and we affirm the judgment.
Comments on P. v. Hernandez CA4/3