In re T.M. CA4/3
S.M. (father), the father of T.M., age 13; M.M., age 12; L.M., age 9; B.M., age 7; and W.M., age 4, appeals from an order denying him visitation with his children during the pendency of this juvenile dependency proceeding. The court concluded visitation with the father would be detrimental to the children following an Evidence Code section 730 evaluation (730 evaluation) ordered by the trial court at the dispositional hearing. The father contends the order must be reversed because that finding is unsupported by substantial evidence and also because it is inconsistent with the court’s earlier observation that it “see[s] a benefit to some sort of visitation.”
Comments on In re T.M. CA4/3